In light of our recent spelling test, which surprisingly stumped me repeatedly, I thought I'd post this piece. Oh yeah, and I'd get more A's in spelling if the only requirement was to put the letters provided in the correct order.
Here is an [unsigned] article which is making the e-mail circuit. It tries to prove that all of us read with a whole word approach.
"Can you raed tihs?
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid; aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
If you can raed tihs forwrad it."
Read more about this at http://www.learningbooks.net/wholeword.html
1 comment:
Yes, I could :-)
Spelling is one of those things everyone--except spelling champions--has to master. I got the words in the first set right, but not in the second (I missed several). The lesson for me is that a good editor always has a good dictionary handy.
Post a Comment